|
The primary goal of
management of gliomas is not only to prolong the survival, but also to
protect/improve the neurological function. Treatment strategies should be
such that it should achieve total ablation of the tumor without morbidity,
and prevent or delay the recurrence.
Emotional support
for the
patients and their families is a critical component of treatment and
management, because of the low-curability rates of most malignant brain
tumors. Experts have made a number of recommendations to help both
patients and caregivers:
Any physical impairment
that could benefit from home equipment or physical therapy should be
identified and treated.
Patients should discuss
emotional as well as physical issues with their physicians. Depression,
for instance, can be medically treated.
Relaxation techniques,
meditation, and spiritual resources can be extremely helpful. Support
groups are beneficial, but experts recommend separate groups for patients
and their families.
The children with cancer have no more emotional or social problems than
their healthy peers. In fact, teachers and students reported that, on
average, such children tended to be less aggressive and more likable than
their peers. It is more likely that the parents and caregivers suffer more
emotionally. Caregivers themselves must seek help for the inevitable
stress, depression, and tension arising from their difficult role.
Medical
therapy
is symptomatic and usually involves the use of steroids,
and
anticonvulsant medication in addition to analgesics, and antiemetics. Side
effects of steroids can be significant, and all patients should be treated
with an H2-receptor blocker. The dose of steroids should be
tailored for each patient and assessed on a regular basis. It is better to
avoid late-night dosing if possible, as it can lead to sleep disturbances
and behavioral problems.
The typical
dexamethasone dose employed by most physicians preoperatively is 4 mg (po/IV)
every 6 hours, and the dose is tapered postoperatively. Patients need to
be followed closely during the tapering period.
Antiepileptic drug
practice has historically been dependent on the neurosurgeon's preference,
and most patients are started on prophylactic anticonvulsants. It is
recommended that prophylactic anticonvulsants is not required in newly
diagnosed brain tumor patients who have never had a seizure. he patients
who have had seizure need to continue the anticonvulsants post
operatively.
Surgery
continues to be its basic therapy and plays a central role in
interdisciplinary glioma management.
Rickman Godlee
performed the first
surgery for a glioma in 1884.
Cushing, Dandy,
and Krause redefined the neurosurgical principles in the early 90s.
Today's surgeon has a
battery of tools in imaging and surgery.
The principles and
techniques of surgery and adjuvant therapy are the same for all intrinsic
brain tumors.
The sites and types of
tumor may necessitate minor modifications, and are discussed elsewhere.
Various surgical
options are available, and the surgical approach should be carefully
chosen to maximize tumor resection while preserving vital brain structures
and minimizing the risk of postoperative neurologic deficits.
The choice of operative
approach depends on the location, size, gross characteristics (extent of
demarcation, consistency, and vascularity), probable histology, and radio
sensitivity of the tumor, as well as on the neurological status and
general condition of the patient, and, of course, the surgeon's technical
ability, and available tools.
Open Surgery:
A meticulous
preoperative planning is mandatory. The planning starts at bedside.
Intrinsic tumors,
generally, is confined to sulcal boundaries, and do not cross pial
barriers.
A proper history and
clinical examination, obtained at the bedside, may give a 'clue' about the
exact site where the tumor started, and help in tumor excision. A tumor,
which appears to be a fronto-parietal on CT/MRI, may be actually a
frontal tumor starting in the frontal lobe and growing backwards pushing
the central sulcus backwards, and will have significant motor deficit with
no sensory deficit at examination. Hence a generous excision may be
planned, and will not damage the motor strip.
A thorough pre
operative study of all radiological imaging must be reviewed, with special
attention to tumor location and neighborhood 'eloquent areas', vascular
channels, central sulcus, sylvian fissure ,widened sulci overlying the
tumor, and other safe corridors; special reference to be made to the
preferred position of the patient at surgery, and aim of the surgery.
"The brain floats in a
sea of CSF, with rivers of CSF which allows access to its interior", says
Yasergil.
Recent advances in neuroimaging with MRI, MR/CT angiogram, MR
spectroscopy, and functional MRI have greatly helped the surgeon decide on
the so called 'safe corridors'.
Preoperative
corticosteroids provide rapid, often dramatic, symptomatic improvement.
Therapeutic effect of steroids is limited to 6-8 weeks. The daily
standard dose is 16 to 24 mg for dexamethasone and 80 to 120 mg for
methylprednisolone. Dose-related symptomatic improvement with minimal side
effects has been shown for up to 96 mg of dexamethasone and 500 mg of
methylprednisolone daily. The effects of corticosteroids include,
reduction of tumor mass, reduction of peritumoral edema, decrease in
permeability of the blood-brain barrier, and increase in cell cycle time.
All patients with a
history of seizures should receive anticonvulsants.
The prophylactic use of
anticonvulsants is controversial similar to the use pre operative
antibiotics.
Position of the patient
at surgery is most important.
The site of lesion, the
familiarity of the surgeon should be taken into account.
Osmodiuretic therapy is
very useful in both an emergency and a peri-operative
situation.
A surface marking of
sagittal sinus, central sulcus and sylvian fissure will help in their
protection at surgery.
Sylvian fissure -
a line drawn from nasion to lambda (approximately corresponds to EOP).
Rolandic fissure - a
line perpendicular to the midpoint of a line drawn from outer margin of
the eyebrow and the tragus.
It is then possible to
outline the frontal, parietal, and the temporal lobes.
Posterior to a line
from the lambda to the posterior mastoid is the occipital lobe.
Individual variations
is the rule.
The scalp incision
should provide sufficient exposure of the relevant cranium, maintain
adequate blood supply to the scalp flap and minimize cosmetic deformity.
Traditionally, various classical flaps have been described.
Infiltration of 2%
xylocaine and adrenaline (1:200,000) mixture, if permitted by the
anesthetist, in the connective tissue overlying the galea helps in
dissection as well as controlling the blood loss.
Bone removal
should preserve blood supply to the bone plate, avoid air sinuses, remove
sufficient bone to permit identification of cranial and parenchymal
landmarks, achieve brain retraction without compression, and avoid
extensive exposure of uninvolved cortex. Most surgeons advise a generous
craniotomy for gliomas.
In the author's
experience, a generous craniotomy do not add to benefits.
A dural flap is turned towards the venous
sinus closest to the exposure, taking precautions to avoid the cortical
veins.
Use of a quality
microscope in tumor removal from this stage is the order of the
day.
Neuroendoscope assisted
microsurgery is becoming popular, and helps in exploring the corners with
minimal brain retraction.
'En bloc resection' may
be achieved in a surface (lobar) tumor an area that is either clinically
silent or already non-functional. Technical refinements in surgery with
subpial dissection or transsulcal approaches with brain mapping and awake
craniotomy has helped for tumors at eloquent areas.
In lesions over the
sulci, the transit vessels must be preserved as they may be supplying the
normal brain.
A subcortical tumor can
be identified by distortion of neuroanatomical landmarks.
The overlying gyri may
be flattened and pale due to paucity of vascularity.
Gentle palpation and
/or needling with a brain cannula may help in the absence of surface
changes.
A glioblastoma is
softer, whereas a low grade glioma would be firmer with respect to the
surrounding parenchyma.
Alternatively,
delineation of the subcortical dimensions by real-time B-mode
ultrasonography, or performing a cortical incision under stereotactic
guidance, if available, may be carried out.
Overlying cortex may be
removed in 'non eloquent' areas and the tumor may be debulked from inside
out.
Piecemeal excision is
preferred. The common oncologic principles of surgical excision cannot be
applied to brain tumors; clearance margin of 1.5 to 5 cms around the tumor
margin cannot be given in most brain tumors in view of risk of severe
morbidity. The surgeon is forced to enter the tumor and debulk it before
excising the capsule.
The site of the
cortical incision and the angle and depth of the transparenchymal approach
are determined by the location and shape of the tumor with respect to
eloquent cortex, major fiber tracts and deep nuclei as well as bone
prominences, dural septa, vascular structures and ventricles.
Intratumoral bleeding
may be a problem, and will stop only with tumor excision.
Intratumoral resection
is needed to avoid eloquent areas such as, Pre and Postcentral gyrus,
Calcarine gyri bilaterally
Dominant posterior inferior frontal gyrus,
Posterior superior temporal gyrus, Inferior parietal lobule,
and Nondominant superior parietal lobule.
In the rare instance in
which an eloquent gyrus must be incised, the incision should be made
transversely to its axis.
The tumor is
facilitated by suction, bipolar coagulation and microscissors, and , if
available by, ultrasonic aspiration, and laser. Disruption of uninvolved
tracts of white matter, or opening the ventricle must be avoided.
The goal is maximal
tumor removal without creation of new neurological deficits.
Recent advances
have made removal of a
strategically located tumor possible.
Successful excision of
deep seated (thalamus and basal ganglia) gliomas through trans sylvian-trans
insular approach, trans callosal approach, and trans cortical-trans
ventricular approach, have been reported with image guided surgery.
Lobectomy in addition
to gross total tumor excision, may be useful for large temporal and
frontotemporal tumors.
Lobectomy with partial
tumor excision has no benefit.
Associated
hydrocephalus may need a
drainage procedure.
Postoperative
CT scan or MRI scan with and without contrast material within 48 hours
after surgery is recommended to study the residual tumor, if any. After 48
hours, post operative changes may mask the residual tumor mass in a scan.
Reoperation:
Advances in surgical
glioma management suggest that reoperation of malignant tumors may be
justified by the palliative effect of tumor mass reduction, which in turn
enhances the cytotoxic effect of adjuvant therapy.
Reoperation should be
considered when a substantial mass of tumor can be removed and the
patient’s age, response to earlier surgery, and performance status suggest
the potential for improvement of quality of life.
The rationale for
reoperation is the same as for the original operation (confirmation of
tumor histology and reduction of tumor mass).
Tumor Biopsy:
Biopsy is performed
when open surgery is not planned any reason. Blind burrhole biopsy is
outdated.
Stereotactic frames
provide a rigid, three-dimensional (3D) coordinate system for accurate
targeting of brain lesions identified on CT or MRI scans. Stereotaxy is
particularly well-suited for obtaining tissue for biopsy from tumors
located in deep structures, such as the thalamus, basal ganglia, and
brainstem, or in other sites where aggressive tissue removal would produce
unacceptable neurologic deficits . A
limitation of
stereotactic biopsy is that small volumes of tissue are obtained, and
tissue sampling errors may result in failure to reach a correct diagnosis.
Stereotactic biopsy may be nondiagnostic in about 10 of cases and has a
surgical morbidity of approximately 5%.
Controversies
exist in the
timing and nature of Glioma surgery.
Patient's age and
general condition, neurological status, and location and presumed nature
of the tumor are the deciding factors.
Surgery is widely
recommended, when the tumor is associated with raised ICP, and progressive
neurological deficit, or intractable epilepsy. Easily accessible tumors in
the 'non eloquent' areas may be excised.
The controversy is in a
radiologically low grade tumor in an eloquent area, with no raised
ICT or neurological deficit.
When to operate?
Infiltrative nature of
most gliomas, multifocality of gliomas, varied biological behavior of the
tumors, potential deficits and complications related to surgery, and the
widely accepted, though controversial, view that interventions may provoke
progression to a higher grade, are the arguments against surgery.
Additionally, it has been claimed that this line of treatment leaves ample
time for the toxic effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy to manifest.
The patients are
offered only symptomatic treatment with or without a biopsy. However,
theses patients need regular follow ups.
The advocates of early
surgery argue that CT and MRI, despite recent advances, do not give an
accurate pathological diagnosis. The surgeon is better equipped with a
tissue diagnosis to arrange for further therapy. Contrast enhancement is
not reliable, and these days of medico legal problems, a tissue diagnosis
is a must.
How much to remove?
Most studies, all of
which are retrospective, suggest that a gross total excision of a low
grade glioma and incomplete excision followed by radiotherapy prolong the
survival. Moreover, it has been suggested that extent of surgery is an
important factor in predicting recurrence, and that the recurrent tumors
show higher grade. The advocates for radical surgery claim that extensive
surgery may favorably influence the recurrence rates, modify tumor
behavior, and ultimately prolong the survival. Gross total excision may
control the seizures. Large tumor tissue avoids sampling error as in
stereotactic biopsy, and helps in molecular study. Some gliomas (
pilocytic astrocytomas) are 'curable' by surgery alone. These studies are
not randomized or even case controlled trials.
Another group of
surgeons feel total resection, given the infiltrative and multifocal
nature of these gliomas, do not provide any additional benefit. They
recommend a tissue diagnosis and appropriate radiotherapy and
chemotherapy.
The author recommends
that the decision has to be individualized, taking into account of the
patient condition and the surgeon's surgical skills, and that radiotherapy
may be with held after gross total excision in low grade tumors.
Deep seated
radiologically high grade gliomas with no significant raised ICP or
neurological deficit, surgery may not be recommended despite all the
surgical advances. A stereotactic biopsy and appropriate radiotherapy and
chemotherapy is widely practiced. The tumor cells infiltrate far beyond
the visible tumor margins, and the radiology may reveal only about 505 to
60% of the tumor, it has been suggested. Even lobectomy has not shown any
survival benefit is high grade tumors.
Some surgeons have
reported longer survival times with total excision. They consider a gross
total resection to be more beneficial than a partial resection or biopsy.
Some others found no correlation between the degree of cytoreductive
surgery and survival.
This issue has never
been investigated in a prospective randomized manner.
Radical resection, in
addition to establishing the histological diagnosis, provides immediate
palliation, reestablishes the intracranial CSF dynamics, reactivates
immunological self defence, enhances the effect of adjuvant therapy by
removing resistant cells, and moving cells into more vulnerable phases of
the cell cycle, and also by reducing the target (tumor) load.
It has been generally
agreed that > 98 % resection results in prolonged survival, and < 94 %
resection is only diagnostic & symptomatic benefit, but no statistical
survival benefit.
The author recommends
gross total excision for all radiologically high grade tumors in non
eloquent areas, provided the patient's age and general condition permits.
Tumors in eloquent areas with neurological deficits, may also be excised,
as it will improve the existing neurological deficit, and the quality of
life, though temporarily.
Photodynamic therapy:
Photodynamic (Photoradiation)
therapy has been in use for certain cases of cancer of the esophagus and
non-small cell lung cancer, and most recently, to treat actinic keratosis,
a precancerous skin condition. It is a form of treatment that depends on
the selective retention of a photosenstizer followed by laser treatment
with light of an appropriate wavelength. The theoretical advantage is that
it is a two component or binary system which generates singlet oxygen
capable of selectively killing tumor cells only when combined together,
presumably avoiding significant damage to normal tissues. It has long been
known that hematoporphyrin has a propensity to localize in tumor tissue.
This accumulation has been linked to the degree of vascularity, the number
of low density lipoprotein receptors on the tumor plasma membrane, the
decreasing extracellular pH, and uptake by non-viable cells in necrotic
regions.
Irradiation of a cell
incorporating a photosenstizer, such as hematoporphyrin derivatives, by
low power visible light induces photochemical reactions which lead to cell
death. HpDs1, and in particular, a purified component called Photofrin (HpD-II),
are currently being used in clinical trials. The blood brain barrier
(BBB) is not permeable for
hematoporphrin, thus normal brain does not take up HpD-II and there is
selective killing of tumor cells, that are not resected at surgery.
Following tumor excision,
the tumor bed is cleared off hematoma and hemostatic agents, and filled
with photosenstizer uniformly. The laser beam, as calculated, is applied
for about 30 to 60 minutes. The usual post operative management is carried
out in a dark room. The radiotherapy is started after four weeks, as HpDs1
may remain for some time in small vessels.
The safety and
effectiveness of this therapy need further studies.
Radiotherapy
is discussed elsewhere.
Adjuvant Therapy:
At the time of
diagnosis most glioblastomas have a tumor mass of approximately 100g with
an estimated cell content of 1011. After surgery and
radiotherapy 102 or 103 cells will remain. The
immune system is able to cope with 105.
The remaining 1023
cells are the goal of adjunctive therapies, in order to control
local tumor growth.
Chemotherapy:
Chemotherapy is the only established adjuvant treatment, but still many
questions concerning clinical effectiveness exist. In pediatric brain
tumor treatment chemotherapy has found wider application.
As an attempt to avoid
the effects of radiotherapy in those under 3 years of age,
preirradiation
chemotherapy is being tried.
It is indicated for
high-grade malignant gliomas as an adjuvant to surgery and radiotherapy or
surgery in recurrent tumors. Reports suggest that the median survival time
(MST) with surgery alone is 14 weeks, and with radiotherapy it is 36
weeks, and that single agent chemotherapy improves MST to 51-73 weeks. It
is
discussed elsewhere.
In recent years,
minimizing the side effects of chemotherapy, and radiotherapy is an
important consideration. A better understanding of the molecular events
leading to tumor development has provided an opportunity to intervene with
experimental modalities, such as,
genetherapy,
immunotherapy, and
angiostatic therapy.
In addition,
other investigatory agents include,
Retinoids.
Retinoids are vitamin A derivatives and act as differentiating agents in
cancer treatments. That is, they can convert immature, dividing tumor
cells into mature cells, stopping tumor growth. In one study, retinoic
acid appeared to have modest clinical activity against recurrent malignant
gliomas, with tolerable side effects. Other studies indicate that retinoic
acid has no significant effect as a single agent, but combinations with
radiotherapy and other drugs may hold promise. For example, one study
reported some success in treating high-grade malignant gliomas with
radiotherapy and concurrent use of interferon and retinoic acid. Another
showed promise against recurrent gliomas using combinations of retinoic
acid and arabinoside, a chemotherapeutic drug.
Inactivated Viruses.
Investigators are finding that certain viruses may prove to be valuable
fighters of brain cancers. In a 2001 study, a genetically designed
poliovirus was able to target and destroy glioma cells. The virus is
altered so that it does not cause polio. Other viruses are being
investigated. A drug based on this model is years away, however.
Toxins.
Agents are being developed that use toxins to kill malignant brain cells.
One promising agent
employs diphtheria (TransMID-107R). This drug is now in late clinical
trials for recurring cancer but is also being investigated for newly
diagnosed and metastatic brain cancers.
A mushroom toxin (irofulven)
is a potent cancer-cell killer and is in second-phase clinical trials.
Chlorotoxin, a
substance derived from scorpions, is being investigated in early-phase
studies.
Imatinib (Gleevac).
Imatinib inhibits an enzyme called Bcr-Abl kinase, which is produced by
certain leukemia cancer cells and has been approved for these leukemias.
Although Gleevac is an unproven treatment for brain tumor, early trials on
recurrent malignant glioma are under way.
Taurolidine.
Taurolidine is a unique agent that prevents tumor formation and growth in
animals. An early clinical trial in patients with high-grade gliomas is
under way.
Protein-Blocking
Drug.
Another development is the discovery of a protein called BEHAB
(brain-enriched hyaluronan binding protein). BEHAB is produced only by
invasive glioma tumor cells, not by normal brain tissue or noninvasive
tumor cells. Breakdown of BEHAB releases a substance called HABD (hyaluronan-binding
domain), which appears to give glioma cells the ability to invade other
areas of the brain. Both BEHAB and HABD represent potential targets for
new therapies.
Terminal care:
Inevitably, the surgeon is faced with the
terminal phase of a glioma patient at some stage. Easily treatable,
reversible cause of neurological deterioration, such as, uremia and
electrolyte disturbances should be ruled out
before the terminal care begins.
Honesty, understanding, and compassion of the health professionals
form the basis for terminal care.
The comfort of the patient should become the
goal.
The futility of any further anticancer
therapy, investigations and interventions should be acknowledged.
High quality nursing is most essential, with
special attention to bed, bowel and bladder care.
Opiods can be used liberally for pain; 'fentnyl'
patch is a good alternative.
Sedation can be used to combat agitation,
anxiety, fear, and mental distress.
Antiemetics are useful, in anticipation of
vomiting.
Convulsions can be controlled with rectal
diazepam.
Intravenous route is avoided; rectal,
transdermal, and subcutaneous routes are preferred.
There are many
ethical issues
involved in terminal care. Good communication and interdisciplinary
involvement are the essential part of the terminal phase.
The patient should be involved in all
decisions, if possible.
To maintain dignity, the patients must
be able to do things in their own way, and preside over their own dying.
Conclusion:
Glioma management is a team management. Goals
of management should be realistic, with a strong emphasis on palliative
care, and the every member of the team should be aware of the goal.
While mortality
statistics for brain tumors have not changed significantly over the past
10 years for most primary brain tumors, morbidity and our understanding of
the molecular basis for tumor development have.
Despite enormous
strides in diagnostics, surgical tools, and other adjuvant treatment
modalities in our armamentarium,
the etiology,
pathogenesis, and biological behavior of the brain tumors still remain
unknown.
There is no consensus
on treatment, and the prognosis of brain tumors continues to be dismal.
Although a prospective
randomized study seems unlikely, retrospective, matched studies, and
prospective, observational trials can improve our understanding. New
strategies aimed at targeted sites on tumors are now in development.
The future, hopefully,
is in molecular biology, genetics, and biotechnology. |