Introduction:
Fifty years have lapsed since
the corticosteroids (CS) were first employed as anti-inflammatory drugs in
the Rheumatic diseases.(1) Initial optimism that these drugs would
revolutionize the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases like
Rheumatoid arthritis turned to caution and thereafter to unease as the
significant side effect profile of these agents became apparent. CS
represents a classic therapeutic double - edged sword, with their profound
anti-inflammatory activity balanced by serious risk of adverse effects in
long-term, high-dose use.
Mechanism of action of
corticosteroids:
CS exert their manifold effects
on cells involved in immune and inflammatory responses primarily by
modulating the transcription of a large number of genes. However they are
also able to influence the translational and post-translational mechanisms
by which proteins are synthesized , processed and exported from cells. As
a steroid molecule, glucocorticoids are lipophilic and readily transported
across the blood-brain barrier. They are readily absorbed from the
gastrointestinal tract, and are effective in a wide range of doses that
can be administered orally or parenterally. In fact there is much
controversy regarding the optimum dose, route and the type of
glucocorticoid that is most effective. It is also difficult to determine
bio-equivalence between steroids. In spite of all these limitations,
glucocorticoids remain the mainstay of treatment for all autoimmune
disorders. Extensive research in molecular events of glucocorticoid
function has been the subject of many reviews .
Virtually every cell has
glucocorticoid receptors. These receptors are located on the cell membrane
as well as in the cytosol. When glucocorticoid steroids enter the cell
cytoplasm by binding to the membrane receptor, binding to the carboxyl
terminal of the receptor results in a conformational change. The DNA
binding domain on the receptor with the 2 zinc fingers become activated
and the steroid-receptor complex attaches itself to the DNA after it
travels to the nucleus. Such binding to DNA occur at specific nucleotide
sequences, sites known as glucocorticoid responsive elements. These
consensus sequences can be positive or negative depending on the ultimate
effect on transcription at that promoter location. Accordingly,
glucocorticoid treatment can result in enhanced or repressed transcription
of specific molecules. Glucocorticoids have a wide array of activity and
affect virtually every cell in the immune system. In particular, the cells
of the lymphoid origin are affected. It is indeed an old observation that
lymphopenia occur during glucocorticoid treatment. Function of T and B
cells and macrophages are all affected, as also antigen presenting cells
such as endothelial cells, microglia, and dendritic cells. These drugs can
augment transcription, resulting in enhanced production of one lymphokine,
while causing repression and down-regulation of the production of
another.
Some of these activities are
dose dependent and therefore these drugs tend to function differently at
different doses. Glucocorticoids exert their beneficial effects at many
levels. Virtually every cell type in the immune system is affected.
Nevertheless, the macrophages appear to be most sensitive to
corticosteroid effects, followed by B-cells, and then the T-lymphocytes.
There are almost 3 times as many Glucocorticoid receptors on the
macrophages as on B-cells and T-cells. Macrophages once considered as
simple scavenging cells, are today recognized as primary pro-inflammatory
cells, especially when antibodies and complement are involved in mediation
of injury.
Macrophages home to sites of
antibodies and activated complement and mediate injury. Corticosteroids
down-regulate the expression of Fc and C3b receptors on macrophages and
reduce the secretion of proinflammatory lymphokines and eicosanoids.
Expression of class II histocompatibility molecules is reduced, which in
turn inhibits antigen presentation. Expression of adhesion molecules is
inhibited, which reduces cell-cell interactions. Endothelial cells no
longer permit cell migration, and inhibition of metalloproteases further
reduces breakdown of the blood-brain barrier .
Clinical use of
Glucocorticoids:
There is no consensus among
clinicians as to how corticosteroids are best used in clinical practice.
In part, this is a reflection of the lack of studies to examine the
optimal use of these agents. Most clinicians use oral or intravenous
steroids as short or long-term treatments for a variety of immune mediated
disorders.
Oral regimen:
Commonly used agents include
prednisolone or dexamethasone. Prednisolone is usually used in doses of 1
mg/kg, and dexamethasone in doses of 4 to 16 mg per day. Oral regimens are
suited for short or long-term use. During short-term use, steroids are
given for a week or less and discontinued without a taper. For long-term
use, prednisolone is the preferred drug since its short half-life will
lend itself to the alternate day regimen. They stabilize the blood brain
barrier, and affect mostly macrophage and some B-cell function with
limited effects on the T-cells.
What are the advantages and
disadvantages of these agents?
Dexamethasone is more anti-phlogistic,
less mineralocorticoid than prednisone, and therefore a better choice.
However, the long acting nature of the compound (half-life of 36 to 72
hours) does not lend itself to alternate-day regimen (see
below).
What is the bio-equivalence of
prednisolone and dexamethasone?
The approximate bio-equivalence is
determined by a combination of relative equivalence and the biological
half-life. For example, the relative equivalence of dexamethasone to
prednisolone is 5, since dexamethasone is 25 fold more potent than
hydrocortisone as compared to prednisolone, which is 5 fold more potent
(17). The biological half-life of prednisolone is 8 hours (8 to 24 hours)
as compared to 32 hours for dexamethasone (32 to 72 hours). Since one
half-life of dexamethasone is equal to 4 half-lives of prednisolone, the
biological equivalence of the two compounds is approximately 40 mg of
prednisone to each mg of dexamethasone, and not 5 mg of prednisolone to 1
mg of dexamethasone as may be suggested by the relative equivalence. These
derivations are approximate, since the absorption characteristics and
biological half-lives of these compounds are variable from one patient to
another.
Parenteral use of
corticosteroids:
Intravenous administration of
corticosteroids permits the use of large doses of corticosteroids, doses
not feasible through oral formulation. Patients receive 500 to 1000 mg of
methyl prednisolone daily for 3 to 5 days. The prednisolone is mixed in
100 ml of saline and administered over 2 to 4 hours. Some patients
experience metallic taste in the mouth, but otherwise the drug is well
tolerated. Although serious complications including acute myocardial
infarction, acid peptic disease, pancreatitis, and delayed aseptic
necrosis of the femur have all been reported with this treatment, such
occurrences are fortunately rare (18). Nevertheless, patients should be
informed of these possibilities. During treatment, daily electrolytes,
glucose, and amylase should be obtained and abnormalities if any,
corrected during treatment.
Are there any differences
between oral and parenteral regimen ?
The Optic Neuritis Treatment
Trial would suggest that such differences exist, at least for treatment of
acute optic neuritis.This multicenter study examined 3 treatment
groups for patients with acute optic neuritis seen within 8
days:
Group 1.
Methylprednisololone 250 mg IV q 6 hours for 3 days, followed by
prednisolone 1 mg/kg tapered over a total duration of treatment of 14
days.
Group 2. Oral prednisolone 1
mg/kg , tapered over 14 days
Group 3. Placebo for 14
days. A total of 450 subjects were randomized into each of the 3
arms.
Improvement of the visual
acuity, visual fields, and color contrast sensitivity were observed in the
IV group, evident as early as 2 weeks. By 6 months all groups were similar
with regards to improvement of acuity, and 75% of all subjects had
recovered vision to 20/20. What was however unexpected from this study was
the fact that optic neuritis occurred in the opposite unaffected eye more
often in the oral prednisolone group.
The recommendation after this
study was therefore to use IV steroids, or no steroids at all, for
treatment of acute optic neuritis. Since this study, there has been
considerable interest as to whether the observed differences were a result
of the differences in dose or route of administration. It would appear
that the differences were based on the differences in dose rather than
route since administration of 1 gm of methyl prednisolone by mouth was
comparable in efficacy to the same dose administered IV. Further, it has
been shown that disruption of the gastric mucosa does not occur to any
greater degree by administration of the larger 1 gm dose as compared to 80
mg of prednisolone.
Indications:
Multiple
Sclerosis:
Agent
Exacerbations:
I.V.Methyl Prednisolone 1gm. IV daily for 3-7 days,
followed by an oral steroid taper with Prednisolone:
200mg x 4days then
100mg x 4 days then decreasing by 10mg daily until off, or Dexamethasone
Taper:12mg x 4days then 8mg x 4days then 4mg x 4days.
Specific neuromuscular
disorders
Muscle
-
Inflammatory myopathies
Some Muscular dystrophy: Duchenne; ? LGMD 2D
Neuromuscular junction
- Myasthenia
gravis
Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome
Nerve-
Chronic immune demyelinating polyneuropathy
(CIDP)
Vasculitis & Vasculopathies
Usual doses:
Start at high dose then
taper
Solu-Medrol (Methylprednisolone): 1 gram IV daily for 3 to 5
days
Prednisolone: Usually start at 50 mg to 100 mg per day (1
mg/kg/day): Single daily dose in am
Exception: Myasthenia
gravis
Start at lower dose: 10 mg
qd
Then gradually increase up to 50 mg qd
With respiratory or bulbar
symptoms: Pre treat using Plasma Exchange
Maintenance
Solu-Medrol
Start at 1 gm/week IV for 1 month
Then 1
gm every 2 weeks for 2 months
Taper further by increasing time between
doses Prednisolone
Start taper after: 3 to 6 months; or Clinical
improvement
Taper slowly by 5 mg every 2 to 6 weeks
Risk of
recurrent symptoms with taper: Varies with disease type
Myasthenia
gravis: > 90% recurrence if steroids stopped
Inflammatory myopathy:
~ 50% recurrence risk
CIDP: Relapse more common
Disease course >
1 year
Adults > Children
Monitor:
Weight; Blood pressure; Blood
glucose & electrolytes; Ocular exam
Advantages of corticosteroid
therapy
Short onset of action (1 to 3 months)
Effective in majority
of patients with specific disease indications
Can be used in
pregnancy
Disadvantages of corticosteroid
therapy
Transient initial severe
exacerbation, usually after 1 to 3 weeks (2%).
Many are long-term side effects
( Fewer with intermittent Solumedrol);
Glucocorticoid side effects:
Cushingoid features, Weight gain, Avascular necrosis, Osteoporosis,
Myopathy, Myosin-loss, Type II atrophy, Diabetes, Acne, Striae,
Hyperpsychosis, Pseudotumor cerebri, Glaucoma, Infection
Drug
combinations:
Corticosteroids +Azathioprine:
Steroid sparing effects . Cyclophosphamide: Additional efficacy, but high
toxicity.