Minimally invasive spinal surgery

–widened interlaminar approach for removal of spinal intradural extramedullary tumors.

 

Dr Samit Mehta,

Senior Resident, Department of Neurosurgery

Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, India.

                                                                     

Introduction

Spinal intradural extramedullary tumors are generally removed by single or multiple level laminectomies with midline dural incision. Rare cases of delayed postoperative kyphosis and spinal instability may be reduced by unilateral or bilateral microsurgery, causing minimum damage to ligaments and tissues.

We present our experience with treating 18 cases with spinal intradural extramedullary tumors by minimally invasive spinal surgery.

                                         

 

Materials and Methods

18 symptomatic patients with laterally placed intradural extramedullary tumors less than or equal to 3 cm were operated between March 2000 – March 2006. There were 13 males and 5 females.

The size of the tumor was between 2 to 3 cm the histology mostly consisted of Schwannoma, neurofibroma, meningioma. Site of the tumor was between D8 to S1, most commonly at L1- L2

 

 

Patient data

Patient no

Age /sex

Size of tumor

Histology

Site

Side

1

32 / M

3 cm

Schwannoma

D 12 – L1

Right

2

36 / M

2cm

Neurofibroma

L1 – L2

Right

3

42/F

2.5 cm

Schwannoma

L1 – L2

Left

4

29/M

3 cm

Neurofibroma

L 4 – L5

Left

5

38/M

2cm

Neurofibroma

L5 – S 1

Left

6

49/M

2.5 cm

Neurofibroma

L3 – L4

Right

7

24/F

2.5 cm

Schwannoma

D 11 – D 12

Left

8

27/M

3 cm

Neurofibroma

L 3 – L 4

Left

9

35/M

3cm

Neurofibroma

L5 – S1

Right

10

37/M

2.5 cm

Schwannoma

L 2 – L3

Left

11

33/M

3 cm

Neurofibroma

D 11 – D12

Right

12

36/M

3cm

Neurofibroma

L 4 – L5

Right

13

41/F

3 cm

Neurofibroma

L1 – L2

Left

14

45/F

2.5 cm

Schwannoma

L1 – L2

Left

15

49/M

3 cm

Meningioma

D6 – D7

Right

16

33/F

3 cm

Neurofibroma

D1  - D 12

Right

17

36/M

3 cm

Neurofibroma

C 7 – D1

Right

18

39/M

2 cm

Schwannoma

L1 – L2

Right

 

 

Minimally invasive technique - Definition

•         Small incision

 

•         Minimal dissection

 

•         Widening of interlaminar window on one or both sides.

 

 

Inclusion criteria

  1. Symptomatic pts with intradural extramedullary tumors less than or equal to 3 cm.

  2. Laterally placed tumors

 

Exclusion criteria

Patients with tumors extending more than one spinal level; in these patients hemi-laminectomy or laminectomy was done.

 

Investigations

All patients were examined with preoperative plain radiography, MRI and a post operative x ray [static and dynamic] at the affected spinal level and Post operative MRI-one patient.

 

 

Surgical technique

Surgery was performed in the prone position.

The affected spinal level was identified with intraoperative fluoroscopy.

A midline 3 cm skin incision was made. 

A unilateral/ bilateral approach was followed with subperiosteal muscles dissection on the lamina above and below.

The facet joint joint was spared.

With a small paramedial dural incision the total tumor was removed using microsurgical techniques  Water-tight dural closure was done with 5-0 or 6-0 [ prolene / silk ]

 

Dural Closure

 

Water tight

Overlay graft

Number of patients

12 cases

6 cases

Graft used

None

Thoracolumbar fascia

Technical aspect

Confirmed with Valsalva’s

Graft sutured to dura.

 

Results

 

All the patients were mobilized on day 1 and discharged on day 3. No complications resulting from the technique were observed. Static and dynamic plain radiograph films showed that none of them had kyphosis and/or instability 6 month postoperatively. Neurologic results were good. 

Pre-operative MRI

Post-operative MRI

 

Advantages

 

Minimally invasive

Standard approaches

Incision size

Small usually

Longer

Tissue damage

Minimal

More

Blood loss

Less

More

Postop morbidity

Less

More

Mobilization

Early

Late

Anatomy / spinal stability

Preserved

Disrupted

Postop analgesia

Less

More

Orthoses

Not necessary

Necessary

Healing time

Less

Less

Hospital stay

Reduced [3 days]

Longer [ 7 – 10 days]

Overall expense

Less

More

Kyphoses

No

Rare but may occur

The technique reported in the paper should be used more extensively and extended to other intradural extramedullary tumors.

 

 

Disadvantage 

  1. demanding surgical skills

  2. expertise

  3. availability of microscope

  4. dural closure difficult

  5. time consuming[ sometimes ]

 

 

Conclusions

Minimally invasive spinal surgery is superior to standard laminectomy

Cases in which dural closure was difficult, onlay graft was found to circumvent the problem.

Minimally invasive spinal surgery is cost-effective and patient friendly.

References

     Sario-glu AC, Hanci M, et al.Unilateral hemilaminectomy for the removal of the spinal space-occupying lesions. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 1997 Jun; 40(2):74-7.

 

•         Pompili A, Caroli F, Cattani F,Crecco M,etal. Unilateral limited laminectomy as the approach of choice for the removal of thoracolumbar neurofibromas. Spine. 2004 Aug 1;29(15):1698-702

 ^TOP

Click to send your Comments & Interesting case reports;

they will be added to this section a week later.


 

www.

 thamburaj.com