|
Minimally invasive spinal surgery
widened interlaminar approach for removal of spinal
intradural extramedullary tumors.
Dr Samit Mehta,
Senior Resident, Department of Neurosurgery
Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, India.
Introduction
Spinal intradural extramedullary tumors are generally removed
by single or multiple level laminectomies with midline dural
incision. Rare cases of delayed postoperative kyphosis and spinal
instability may be reduced by unilateral or bilateral microsurgery,
causing minimum damage to ligaments and tissues.
We present our experience with treating 18 cases with spinal
intradural extramedullary tumors by minimally invasive spinal
surgery.
Materials and Methods
18 symptomatic patients with laterally placed intradural
extramedullary tumors less than or equal to 3 cm were operated
between March 2000 March 2006. There were 13 males and 5
females.
The size of the tumor was between 2 to 3 cm the histology
mostly consisted of Schwannoma, neurofibroma, meningioma. Site of
the tumor was between D8 to S1, most commonly at L1- L2
Patient data
|
Patient no |
Age /sex |
Size of tumor |
Histology |
Site |
Side |
|
1 |
32 / M |
3 cm |
Schwannoma |
D 12 L1 |
Right |
|
2 |
36 / M |
2cm |
Neurofibroma |
L1 L2 |
Right |
|
3 |
42/F |
2.5 cm |
Schwannoma |
L1 L2 |
Left |
|
4 |
29/M |
3 cm |
Neurofibroma |
L 4 L5 |
Left |
|
5 |
38/M |
2cm |
Neurofibroma |
L5 S 1 |
Left |
|
6 |
49/M |
2.5 cm |
Neurofibroma |
L3 L4 |
Right |
|
7 |
24/F |
2.5 cm |
Schwannoma |
D 11 D 12 |
Left |
|
8 |
27/M |
3 cm |
Neurofibroma |
L 3 L 4 |
Left |
|
9 |
35/M |
3cm |
Neurofibroma |
L5 S1 |
Right |
|
10 |
37/M |
2.5 cm |
Schwannoma |
L 2 L3 |
Left |
|
11 |
33/M |
3 cm |
Neurofibroma |
D 11 D12 |
Right |
|
12 |
36/M |
3cm |
Neurofibroma |
L 4 L5 |
Right |
|
13 |
41/F |
3 cm |
Neurofibroma |
L1 L2 |
Left |
|
14 |
45/F |
2.5 cm |
Schwannoma |
L1 L2 |
Left |
|
15 |
49/M |
3 cm |
Meningioma |
D6 D7 |
Right |
|
16 |
33/F |
3 cm |
Neurofibroma |
D1 - D 12 |
Right |
|
17 |
36/M |
3 cm |
Neurofibroma |
C 7 D1 |
Right |
|
18 |
39/M |
2 cm |
Schwannoma |
L1 L2 |
Right
|
Minimally invasive technique - Definition
Small incision
Minimal dissection
Widening of interlaminar
window on one or both sides.
Inclusion criteria
-
Symptomatic
pts with intradural extramedullary tumors less than or equal to 3
cm.
-
Laterally
placed tumors
Exclusion criteria
Patients with tumors extending more than one spinal level; in
these patients hemi-laminectomy or laminectomy was done.
Investigations
All patients were examined with preoperative plain
radiography, MRI and a post operative x ray [static and dynamic] at
the affected spinal level and Post operative MRI-one
patient.
Surgical technique
Surgery was performed in the prone position.
The affected spinal level was identified with intraoperative
fluoroscopy.
A midline 3 cm skin incision was made.
A unilateral/ bilateral approach was followed with
subperiosteal muscles dissection on the lamina above and below.
The facet joint joint was spared.
With a small paramedial dural incision the total tumor was
removed using microsurgical techniques Water-tight dural
closure was done with 5-0 or 6-0 [ prolene / silk ]
Dural Closure
|
|
Water tight |
Overlay graft |
|
Number of patients |
12 cases |
6 cases |
|
Graft used |
None |
Thoracolumbar fascia |
|
Technical aspect |
Confirmed with Valsalvas |
Graft sutured to
dura. |
|
Results
All the patients were mobilized on day 1 and discharged
on day 3. No complications resulting from the technique were
observed. Static and dynamic plain radiograph films showed
that none of them had kyphosis and/or instability 6 month
postoperatively. Neurologic results were good.
|

|

|
|
Pre-operative MRI |
Post-operative
MRI |
|
Advantages
|
|
Minimally invasive |
Standard approaches |
|
Incision size |
Small usually |
Longer |
|
Tissue damage |
Minimal |
More |
|
Blood loss |
Less |
More |
|
Postop morbidity |
Less |
More |
|
Mobilization |
Early |
Late |
|
Anatomy / spinal stability |
Preserved |
Disrupted |
|
Postop analgesia |
Less |
More |
|
Orthoses |
Not necessary |
Necessary |
|
Healing time |
Less |
Less |
|
Hospital stay |
Reduced [3 days] |
Longer [ 7 10 days] |
|
Overall expense |
Less |
More |
|
Kyphoses |
No |
Rare but may occur
|
The technique reported in the paper should be used more
extensively and extended to other intradural extramedullary
tumors.
Disadvantage
-
demanding
surgical skills
-
expertise
-
availability
of microscope
-
dural closure
difficult
-
time
consuming[ sometimes ]
Conclusions
Minimally invasive spinal surgery is superior to standard
laminectomy
Cases in which dural closure was difficult, onlay graft was
found to circumvent the problem.
Minimally invasive spinal surgery is cost-effective and
patient friendly.
References
Sario-glu AC, Hanci M, et al.Unilateral hemilaminectomy for
the removal of the spinal space-occupying lesions. Minim Invasive
Neurosurg. 1997 Jun; 40(2):74-7.
Pompili
A, Caroli F, Cattani F,Crecco M,etal. Unilateral limited laminectomy as the approach of choice for
the removal of thoracolumbar neurofibromas. Spine. 2004 Aug
1;29(15):1698-702 |